News and information from our partners

Upper Lochsa: land exchange or a legislative fiat?

For the past five years many members of the general public, various organizations, and public officials have come out in opposition to the Upper Lochsa Land Exchange (ULX). They deserve some concrete and public answers from Forest Supervisor Brazell, senators Crapo and Risch, and Representative Labrador to the following questions:

1) What is the ULX going to be – an administrative decision signed by the forest supervisor, or a legislative decision? If the latter, then let’s make an official closure of the exchange by selecting the “No Action” alternative. (Note: the Supplemental DEIS was never within the delegated authority of the forest supervisor.)

2) As a legislative exchange, will the appraisal follow that of the Federal Land Exchange Program as practiced by the BLM and the FS – “a dollar-for-dollar, value-for-value” transaction?

3) Exactly what NF lands are being appraised for the legislative proposal? Will that appraisal of the NF lands be made public and be an integral part of the collaborative process prior to the legislative decision?

4) Will the legislative decision be made public prior to the 2014 election?

John Krebs



Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment


Information from the Free-Press and our advertisers (Want to add your business to this to this feed?)